Supermarket's Compensation Claim Against Insurance Broker Unsuccessful

The dispute centered on Gallagher's failure to secure timely renewal of the supermarket's liability insurance. The supermarket argued that Gallagher did not engage with specialist underwriters and was excessive in disclosing nine years of claims history, which contributed to the premium hike. Additionally, the supermarket claimed that the gap in coverage exposed it to potential legal costs.

Gallagher acknowledged shortcomings in its renewal communication and offered to consider responsibility for any liability claims arising during the uninsured period. However, it denied that the coverage gap was avoidable, citing challenges in securing underwriters willing to cover the supermarket due to its claims history.

AFCA found that while Gallagher breached its professional duty of care by not informing the supermarket about the non-renewal in a timely manner, this did not result in financial loss to the supermarket. The authority deemed Gallagher's offer to consider covering future legal action as reasonable and fair compensation for its conduct. Consequently, Gallagher is not required to pay the supermarket the claimed compensation.

This case highlights the complexities involved in insurance renewals and the importance of clear communication between businesses and their brokers. It also underscores the need for businesses to actively engage in the renewal process to ensure continuous and adequate coverage.